Camp Lotsa Dogs Courtesy Posting for Give A Dog A Second Chance

Someone notified me that Camp Lotsa Dogs doggie daycare/boarding/rescue is "courtesy posting" ads for dogs on Petfinder for Give A Dog A Second Chance.

I do not have past experience with Camp Lotsa Dogs, so I cannot adequately comment on the nature of their relationship.

The owner of this establishment has been notified of this organization has previously been removed from Petfinder. I also contacted her to provide a link to this blog to look over.

Example of Courtesy post:
(contact information indicates to write to doggielover email, which is GADASC's email.



Once the owner of this facility read the blog and found out her facility was mentioned, I was receiving emails, phone calls and voicemails.

Last voicemail:
Someone just forwarded me you blog about Melita. Unfortunately, when you do something like that it is called liable. My lawyer has been given a copy, I know where you live, and I have your number. I will take everything you own for the rest of your life if you don't take my name off your blog. You do not get to terrorize other people, you don't do what she did to you which is terrorize you. You get my fucking name off there, and don't you EVER associate me with you, or her, or anybody else. What I do is my business, but I will have my lawyer take everything you own for the rest of your fucking life you little bitch."

GADASC lies & my counter to them

1. I lied on my application-how does someone even claim you lied on your application if a)they never checked your references b)they never did a home visit?

2. I "pushed to adopt the two dogs without going to see them.

3. All animals are vet checked by GASDASC.

4. I did not contact Melita until months after the dogs got sick. (date they became ill was January 1/09)

5. Melita says that she always admitted she had the warrant out for her arrest.

One of the several past posts where Melita denies that warrant:

6. Melita had charges laid due to shoddy paperwork. She cannot acknowledge the fact that leaving ANY dog in a hot car in obvious distress is animal abuse.

Melita was charged under Agriculture and Markets Law (NYS) Section 353 which reads:

(QUOTE)353. Overdriving, torturing and injuring animals; failure to provide proper sustenance.

A person who overdrives, overloads, tortures or cruelly beats or unjustifiably
injures, maims, mutilates or kills any animal, whether wild or tame, and whether
belonging to himself or to another, or deprives any animal of necessary sustenance,
food or drink, or neglects or refuses to furnish it such sustenance or drink, or
causes, procures or permits any animal to be overdriven, overloaded, tortured,
cruelly beaten, or unjustifiably injured, maimed, mutilated or killed, or to be deprived
of necessary food or drink, or who willfully sets on foot, instigates, engages in, or in
any way furthers any act of cruelty to any animal, or any act tending to produce such
cruelty, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not more than
one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both.(UNQUOTE)

http://icwdm.org/agencies/Laws/NYcrueltylaws1999.pdf

I don't see anything in this section of the law describing incomplete paperwork as a felony!